AI Tool Comparison
Comparing as AI Code Generation & AutocompleteWarp vs Augment Code
Warp
VS
Augment Code
Verdict by Category
Detailed Comparison
Feature
Warp
Augment Code
Pricing
FreemiumWarp uses a credit-based Freemium model with five tiers. The Free tier ($0) includes the full Warp Terminal, Warp Agent CLI access, limited cloud agent sessions, pay-as-you-go credit reloads, and the ability to bring your own AI inference keys.
Build ($20/month, $18 annually) includes 1,500 credits ($20 of agent usage at API rates), full model access (Claude Opus 5, GPT-5.6, Gemini, Fable 5, and more), highest codebase indexing limits, unlimited Warp Drive objects, unlimited cloud conversation storage, auto-reload with team-wide spend caps, and private email support. Max ($200/month, $180 annually) provides 18,000 credits — 12x Build's included usage — for high-volume individual developers. Business ($50/user/month, $45 annually) adds per-seat included credits for up to 25 seats, team usage metrics, admin-configurable data controls, BYOK (bring your own API keys), and SAML SSO.
Enterprise is custom-priced and adds unlimited seats, custom shared credit pools, advanced spend controls, enterprise admin and data governance, BYOLLM (route inference through your own cloud at no credit cost), self-hosted cloud agents on customer infrastructure, custom codebase indexing, cross-harness agent memory, Enterprise Analytics API, a dedicated account manager, shared Slack channel, and white-glove onboarding with an implementation engineer. Warp Factories usage is included in Build/Max/Business plans or available pay-as-you-go at API rates + 20%.
PaidAugment Code uses a usage-based pricing model with two tiers. The Business plan costs $100/month flat for up to 50 seats. This includes $100 of pooled monthly usage across LLM inference (billed at provider list price + 40% service fee), Context Engine API calls, and Cosmos compute. Usage is shared across the whole team. Top-ups are available pay-as-you-go at any time; top-ups expire 12 months after purchase.
The Enterprise plan has custom pricing for teams over 50 seats. It adds custom usage limits and top-up rates, volume-based annual discounts, SSO/OIDC/SCIM, Customer Managed Encryption Keys (CMEK), ISO/IEC 42001 compliance, SIEM integration, data residency options, granular audit trails, multi-region compute, unlimited concurrent sessions, and a dedicated customer success manager with priority support.
All paid plans include a guarantee of no AI training on customer data. A 7-day free trial is available. Previously Augment charged $60/active user/month under a named-seat model before switching to flat/usage-based pricing in October 2025.
Categories
AI Coding AssistantsAI Productivity ToolsAI Developer APIs & PlatformsAI No-Code / Automation Tools
AI Coding AssistantsAI Productivity ToolsAI Developer APIs & Platforms
Summary
The open platform for automating development — terminal, agent CLI, and cloud factories
AI coding agent with deep Context Engine for large enterprise codebases
Warp Pros & Cons
Pros
- Unique market position — the only platform that combines a modern terminal, standalone agent CLI, and cloud SDLC factory infrastructure in one coherent product
- 718,000+ active developers and 51% Fortune 500 adoption with trust signals from OpenAI, Anthropic, Docker, Google, GitHub, NVIDIA, and Stripe
- Open-source terminal (64K+ GitHub stars) with block-based interface that treats commands as first-class objects — groupable, searchable, shareable, and navigable
- Uniquely supports running multiple third-party agents simultaneously — Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, and Warp Agent all side-by-side
- Adding ~$1M ARR per week as of early 2026 — one of the fastest-growing developer tool companies
- SOC 2 certified with Zero Data Retention across all contracted LLM providers and enterprise BYOLLM for full inference control
Cons
- Warp Factories still in Early Access — full enterprise availability and pricing not yet finalized
- Business plan capped at 25 seats — teams larger than 25 must contact Enterprise sales
- Credit-based pricing can be unpredictable for heavy agentic workloads; complex tasks consume more credits than simple completions
- Terminal purists may dislike the proprietary Rust UI layer vs. a standard PTY — some legacy TUI apps have compatibility quirks
- Not an IDE — pairs best with an editor like VS Code or Cursor rather than replacing one; not a standalone coding environment
Augment Code Pros & Cons
Pros
- Deepest codebase context of any AI coding tool — Context Engine indexes 400K+ files with semantic graphs, not just open tabs
- #1 on SWE-bench Pro at 51.80% (Auggie CLI) — top publicly benchmarked coding agent score at publication
- First and only AI coding assistant with ISO/IEC 42001 certification alongside SOC 2 Type II and CMEK
- Usage-based flat pricing ($100/mo for up to 50 seats) is more predictable than per-seat models for variable teams
- Cosmos platform covers the full SDLC — from ticket to PR, code review, tests, incidents, migrations, and onboarding
- Trusted by Adobe, MongoDB, Webflow, Snyk, Pure Storage, Crypto.com, Tekion, and DXC across enterprise codebases
Cons
- No free individual tier — Business plan starts at $100/month with a team minimum; sole developers pay full price for low usage
- Pricing changed three times in 18 months (2023–2025), causing some developer community backlash and unpredictability concerns
- IDE support limited to VS Code and JetBrains — no standalone IDE, no Neovim full feature parity, no Visual Studio
- Closed-source with no self-hosting option — all computation runs on Augment's infrastructure or Enterprise cloud tenants
- Context Engine first-run indexing takes 15–30 minutes on large repos before initial suggestions become fully accurate
- Enterprise plan requires sales contact for pricing — no public list price above the Business tier