AICentralResources
AI Tool Comparison

Comparing as AI Code Generation & Autocomplete
Refact.ai vs Augment Code

Refact.ai

Refact.ai

VS
Augment Code

Augment Code

Verdict by Category

Detailed category analysis is not available for this comparison.
View Refact.ai View Augment Code

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Refact.ai
Augment Code
Pricing
FreemiumRefact.ai is free to start with 2,000 agent/chat coins per month — no credit card required. This covers basic AI Agent and chat usage with access to the platform's full feature set within the monthly quota. Pro costs $10/month (or $8/month billed annually) and provides a higher coin allocation for developers who use the AI Agent and chat heavily on a daily basis. Enterprise pricing is custom and covers three deployment models: self-hosted on your own GPU infrastructure (any hardware you own or rent), AWS-managed (including AWS Inferentia2 for 1.5x price-performance), and VPC/cloud-managed SaaS. Enterprise adds dedicated engineer support, fine-tuning on your private codebase, code access restriction controls, team management dashboard, and SLA guarantees. Contact hello@refact.ai for enterprise pricing.
PaidAugment Code uses a usage-based pricing model with two tiers. The Business plan costs $100/month flat for up to 50 seats. This includes $100 of pooled monthly usage across LLM inference (billed at provider list price + 40% service fee), Context Engine API calls, and Cosmos compute. Usage is shared across the whole team. Top-ups are available pay-as-you-go at any time; top-ups expire 12 months after purchase. The Enterprise plan has custom pricing for teams over 50 seats. It adds custom usage limits and top-up rates, volume-based annual discounts, SSO/OIDC/SCIM, Customer Managed Encryption Keys (CMEK), ISO/IEC 42001 compliance, SIEM integration, data residency options, granular audit trails, multi-region compute, unlimited concurrent sessions, and a dedicated customer success manager with priority support. All paid plans include a guarantee of no AI training on customer data. A 7-day free trial is available. Previously Augment charged $60/active user/month under a named-seat model before switching to flat/usage-based pricing in October 2025.
Categories
AI Coding AssistantsAI Productivity ToolsAI Developer APIs & Platforms
AI Coding AssistantsAI Productivity ToolsAI Developer APIs & Platforms
Summary
Open-source AI coding agent — self-hosted, fine-tuned on your codebase, #1 SWE-bench
AI coding agent with deep Context Engine for large enterprise codebases
Refact.ai

Refact.ai Pros & Cons

Pros

  • #1 on SWE-bench Lite for open-source AI coding agents — independently validated autonomous task completion performance
  • Self-hosted on any hardware including AWS Inferentia2 — first AI coding assistant on Inferentia2 with 1.5x price-performance vs GPU
  • Fine-tuning on private codebase delivers ~45% code acceptance rate — significantly higher than generic completions
  • Open source with full transparency — audit the model, the agent code, and the inference pipeline
  • Supports both open-source LLMs (Code Llama, DeepSeek, Llama) and closed-source models (GPT-4, Claude) in self-hosted mode
  • Free plan with 2,000 coins/month and no credit card — genuinely usable for individual developers and evaluation

Cons

  • Smaller community and brand recognition than GitHub Copilot, Cursor, or Codeium
  • Self-hosted deployment requires GPU hardware and technical infrastructure setup — not trivial for smaller teams
  • Agent mode still maturing compared to more established alternatives like Cursor or Cline
  • Cloud-hosted tier is newer and has fewer enterprise features than established alternatives like Tabnine or Augment Code
  • Visual Studio extension is in beta — not as polished as the VS Code and JetBrains plugins
  • Fine-tuning pipeline requires dedicated setup and data preparation — significant upfront investment for enterprise customization
Augment Code

Augment Code Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Deepest codebase context of any AI coding tool — Context Engine indexes 400K+ files with semantic graphs, not just open tabs
  • #1 on SWE-bench Pro at 51.80% (Auggie CLI) — top publicly benchmarked coding agent score at publication
  • First and only AI coding assistant with ISO/IEC 42001 certification alongside SOC 2 Type II and CMEK
  • Usage-based flat pricing ($100/mo for up to 50 seats) is more predictable than per-seat models for variable teams
  • Cosmos platform covers the full SDLC — from ticket to PR, code review, tests, incidents, migrations, and onboarding
  • Trusted by Adobe, MongoDB, Webflow, Snyk, Pure Storage, Crypto.com, Tekion, and DXC across enterprise codebases

Cons

  • No free individual tier — Business plan starts at $100/month with a team minimum; sole developers pay full price for low usage
  • Pricing changed three times in 18 months (2023–2025), causing some developer community backlash and unpredictability concerns
  • IDE support limited to VS Code and JetBrains — no standalone IDE, no Neovim full feature parity, no Visual Studio
  • Closed-source with no self-hosting option — all computation runs on Augment's infrastructure or Enterprise cloud tenants
  • Context Engine first-run indexing takes 15–30 minutes on large repos before initial suggestions become fully accurate
  • Enterprise plan requires sales contact for pricing — no public list price above the Business tier