AI Tool Comparison
Comparing as AI Clinical Documentation & Medical ScribesFreed AI vs Nabla
Freed AI
VS
Nabla
Verdict by Category
Detailed Comparison
Feature
Freed AI
Nabla
Pricing
PaidFreed publishes clear, tiered pricing, unlike some enterprise-focused competitors that require a sales call. The AI Scribe has four tiers: Starter at $39/month (billed annually) or $59/month (billed monthly) for 1 clinician and up to 40 notes/month; Core at roughly $59-79/month for unlimited notes and Clinical Evidence; Premier at $104/month (annual) or $119/month (monthly) for the full suite including EHR push, dictation, and ICD-10/CPT coding; and custom Groups pricing for multi-clinician clinics with admin dashboards, SSO, and volume discounts. Freed Front Desk, the separate AI receptionist product, starts at $149/month per block of 250 calls. All AI Scribe plans include a 7-day free trial with no credit card required, and residents, students, and trainees can get the Core plan free through Freed's pilot program.
FreemiumNabla does not publish exact pricing on its official website; the primary calls-to-action are a free trial (via app.nabla.com) and "Talk to our team" for enterprise sales. Third-party sources consistently report a free tier with usage limits, with paid individual/clinician plans starting around $119/month per provider and higher tiers reported near $239/month per provider. Larger health-system deployments — Nabla's core market, spanning 130+ organizations — are sold via custom enterprise contracts with volume-based pricing, with independent estimates placing typical enterprise rates in the $150-$400/month per provider range depending on scale, EHR integration depth, and features. Exact costs require a sales conversation with Nabla.
Categories
AI Healthcare ToolsAI Productivity ToolsAI Chatbots
AI Healthcare ToolsAI Productivity ToolsAI Developer APIs & Platforms
Summary
Affordable AI medical scribe and front desk for independent clinics, starting at $39/month
Ambient AI that turns patient visits into clinical notes, dictation, and coding — right inside the EHR
Freed AI Pros & Cons
Pros
- Transparent, published pricing starting at $39/month, unusually clear for the AI medical scribe category
- Purpose-built for independent and small-to-midsized clinics rather than enterprise health systems
- Combines scribing, cited clinical Q&A, and coding suggestions in one affordable tool
- High reported accuracy (98% recall on medical terms) and accessible US-based human support
- New Front Desk product extends the same AI to patient calls and messaging, not just documentation
- 7-day free trial with no credit card required, plus free access for residents and students
Cons
- No native EHR API write-back for most systems; EHR push works only with browser-based EHRs, not deep two-way integrations like Epic or Oracle Health
- Front Desk is still in beta with a waitlisted 'Advanced' tier, so scheduling and insurance verification aren't yet automated
- Higher tiers (Premier, Groups) are needed to unlock EHR push, coding, and multi-user features, which adds up for growing clinics
- Built for browser-based, ambulatory workflows, so it's a weaker fit for large hospital systems already standardized on Epic or Cerner
- Audio is only temporarily retained during processing, so there's no persistent recording to fall back on after a note is finalized
Nabla Pros & Cons
Pros
- Fast note generation, roughly five seconds, that closely mirrors real clinical documentation in independent tests
- Deep native integration with Epic and other major EHRs rather than copy-paste workflows
- Broad specialty and language coverage suited to large, diverse health systems
- Strong compliance posture (HIPAA, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, GDPR) with configurable data retention
- Backed by peer-reviewed evidence, including a NEJM AI randomized trial showing documentation-time reductions
- Combines documentation, dictation, and coding in one platform instead of separate point tools
Cons
- Pricing isn't published; individuals and smaller practices must go through a sales conversation or rely on third-party estimates to budget
- Primarily built for hospitals and health systems, so solo clinicians and small practices may find it less tailored than SMB-focused scribes
- Relies on ambient recording, so encounters where a patient or clinician can't or won't be recorded aren't well supported
- Some independent reviews note limited customization and quality drop-off on complex, multi-problem visits
- Mobile app store ratings are mixed and based on a relatively small number of reviews compared to the platform's overall clinician base