AI Tool Comparison
Comparing as AI Pair Programming & Terminal AgentsZed vs Devin
Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and user ratings to decide which AI tool is best for your needs.
Zed
VS
Devin
Verdict by Category
AI content generation failed. Refresh the page to try again.
Detailed Comparison
Feature
Zed
Devin
Pricing
FreemiumZed offers three tiers. Personal is $0 forever, including 2,000 accepted edit predictions per month and unlimited use with your own API keys or external agents like Claude Agent and Codex CLI. Pro is $10/month with unlimited edit predictions, $5 of included tokens, and usage-based billing beyond that at API list price plus 10%, billed either at month-end or per $10 of overage incurred, whichever comes first; a two-week free trial with $20 of token credits is available (Anthropic's Opus models are excluded from the trial). Business is $30 per seat per month with no minimum seat count, adding org-wide AI model policies, data governance controls, role-based access controls, and unified spend visibility across the organization; order form contracts are available at 25+ seats. Business does not currently offer a free trial, and SSO, SAML, and SCIM are planned but not yet available.
FreemiumDevin's Free plan costs $0/month with a light quota to code with agents, limited model availability, and unlimited inline edits and Tab completions. Pro costs $20/month and adds increased quotas, access to OpenAI, Claude, and Gemini frontier models, free use of SWE 1.7 and leading open-source models, Devin Cloud access, and the ability to purchase extra usage at API pricing. Max costs $200/month with everything in Pro plus significantly higher usage quotas for power users. Teams costs $80/month as a base team fee plus $40/month per full developer seat, and includes unlimited team members via flex seats, sharing and collaboration, centralized billing, an admin dashboard with analytics, and priority support. Enterprise is custom-priced ("let's talk") and adds highest-priority support, dedicated account management, SAML/OIDC SSO, centralized enterprise admin controls, and dedicated VPC deployment options. Usage allowances refresh daily and weekly, and extra usage beyond included quotas is billed at API pricing.
Categories
AI Coding Assistants
AI Coding Assistants
Summary
A minimal, GPU-accelerated code editor built for speed and AI collaboration
Autonomous AI software engineer that plans, codes, and ships end-to-end
Zed Pros & Cons
Pros
- Exceptionally fast, GPU-accelerated Rust editor with near-instant startup and low input latency
- Free Personal plan allows unlimited AI usage with your own API keys at no extra cost to Zed
- Native real-time multiplayer collaboration built into the core editor, not a plugin
- Open Agent Client Protocol (ACP) lets developers bring virtually any agent or model into the editor
- Fully open source, so the codebase can be inspected, extended, and self-hosted
Cons
- Much smaller extension ecosystem (roughly 800) compared to VS Code's 50,000+
- No codebase-wide AI indexing like some competitors, limiting AI context to file-level and open project scope
- SSO, SAML, and SCIM are planned but not yet available, limiting appeal for larger regulated enterprises
- Pro's $5 included token credit is modest and can be exceeded quickly with heavy agentic use, triggering usage-based billing
- Business plan has no free trial, unlike the Pro plan's two-week trial
Devin Pros & Cons
Pros
- Handles full engineering workflows end-to-end, not just inline suggestions
- Fleet-based parallel agents can tackle large-scale migrations across many repos
- Deep integrations with GitHub, Linear, Jira, Slack, and Teams for real dev workflows
- Free tier available to try core agent capabilities with no cost
- Documented enterprise results, including major efficiency and cost gains at Nubank
- VPC deployment and SSO support enterprise security requirements
Cons
- Early benchmark and demo claims were criticized as overstated, so results should be evaluated against a team's own workflows
- Best suited to well-scoped, reviewable tasks rather than fully unsupervised production work
- Usage-based cost can climb quickly for teams running many parallel sessions
- Full model availability and cloud agents require the $20/month Pro plan or higher
- Quality of output still requires human review, especially on complex or ambiguous tasks