AICentralResources
AI Tool Comparison

Comparing as AI Code Generation & Autocomplete
Greptile vs Augment Code

Greptile

Greptile

VS
Augment Code

Augment Code

Verdict by Category

Detailed category analysis is not available for this comparison.
View Greptile View Augment Code

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Greptile
Augment Code
Pricing
FreemiumGreptile uses a credit-based pricing model. The Starter plan is free for 1 active developer with unlimited repositories and 50 credits/month (50 standard reviews or ~16 TREX reviews). No credit card required. The Pro plan is $30/seat/month and includes 50 credits per seat, with additional credits available at $1 each. Credits are consumed as follows: 1 credit = 1 standard PR review, 3 credits = 1 TREX runtime review (sandbox test execution). Pro adds team collaboration, admin controls, and access to all Greptile features. Enterprise pricing is custom and adds SSO, audit logs, self-hosted deployment in your own AWS environment, BYOK (bring your own LLM providers), priority support, and dedicated SLAs. Greptile also offers free usage for qualified open-source projects and significant discounts for pre-Series A startups. A Greptile API is available at discounted bulk pricing for teams building on top of Greptile's codebase intelligence.
PaidAugment Code uses a usage-based pricing model with two tiers. The Business plan costs $100/month flat for up to 50 seats. This includes $100 of pooled monthly usage across LLM inference (billed at provider list price + 40% service fee), Context Engine API calls, and Cosmos compute. Usage is shared across the whole team. Top-ups are available pay-as-you-go at any time; top-ups expire 12 months after purchase. The Enterprise plan has custom pricing for teams over 50 seats. It adds custom usage limits and top-up rates, volume-based annual discounts, SSO/OIDC/SCIM, Customer Managed Encryption Keys (CMEK), ISO/IEC 42001 compliance, SIEM integration, data residency options, granular audit trails, multi-region compute, unlimited concurrent sessions, and a dedicated customer success manager with priority support. All paid plans include a guarantee of no AI training on customer data. A 7-day free trial is available. Previously Augment charged $60/active user/month under a named-seat model before switching to flat/usage-based pricing in October 2025.
Categories
AI Coding AssistantsAI Productivity ToolsAI Developer APIs & Platforms
AI Coding AssistantsAI Productivity ToolsAI Developer APIs & Platforms
Summary
The AI code reviewer that understands your entire codebase — merge 4x faster
AI coding agent with deep Context Engine for large enterprise codebases
Greptile

Greptile Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Deepest codebase context of any code review tool — builds a full graph of files, functions, and dependencies, not just the diff
  • 'Fix with Agent' button uniquely integrates with Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Conductor, and Devin for automated review-fix loops
  • TREX runtime validation (Beta) writes and executes real tests in a sandbox — the only code review tool that actually runs the code
  • Free Starter plan for 1 developer with 50 reviews/month and unlimited repos — genuinely usable with no credit card required
  • Self-hosted and BYOK options for full data sovereignty in air-gapped and regulated environments
  • Trusted by Brex (CTO: 'outperforms them all by a mile'), NVIDIA, Retool, Substack, Scale, PostHog, Mintlify, Zapier, and 22,000+ teams

Cons

  • Credit-based pricing can be unpredictable — TREX runtime reviews cost 3 credits vs 1 for standard reviews, so heavy users of the most valuable feature pay 3x more
  • Pro at $30/seat/month is more expensive than CodeRabbit Pro ($24/user/month) for standard PR review without TREX
  • Founded 2023 by recent graduates — smaller team than competitors like CodeRabbit ($143M raised) despite raising a $30M Series A at $180M valuation
  • Series A reported in talks as of July 2025 but not confirmed closed — some uncertainty around funding timeline
  • Early culture of very long working hours was publicly noted by founder (9am–11pm, 6–7 days/week) — may affect team sustainability
Augment Code

Augment Code Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Deepest codebase context of any AI coding tool — Context Engine indexes 400K+ files with semantic graphs, not just open tabs
  • #1 on SWE-bench Pro at 51.80% (Auggie CLI) — top publicly benchmarked coding agent score at publication
  • First and only AI coding assistant with ISO/IEC 42001 certification alongside SOC 2 Type II and CMEK
  • Usage-based flat pricing ($100/mo for up to 50 seats) is more predictable than per-seat models for variable teams
  • Cosmos platform covers the full SDLC — from ticket to PR, code review, tests, incidents, migrations, and onboarding
  • Trusted by Adobe, MongoDB, Webflow, Snyk, Pure Storage, Crypto.com, Tekion, and DXC across enterprise codebases

Cons

  • No free individual tier — Business plan starts at $100/month with a team minimum; sole developers pay full price for low usage
  • Pricing changed three times in 18 months (2023–2025), causing some developer community backlash and unpredictability concerns
  • IDE support limited to VS Code and JetBrains — no standalone IDE, no Neovim full feature parity, no Visual Studio
  • Closed-source with no self-hosting option — all computation runs on Augment's infrastructure or Enterprise cloud tenants
  • Context Engine first-run indexing takes 15–30 minutes on large repos before initial suggestions become fully accurate
  • Enterprise plan requires sales contact for pricing — no public list price above the Business tier