AI Tool Comparison
Comparing as AI Agent & Orchestration FrameworksFireworks AI vs Together AI
Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and user ratings to decide which AI tool is best for your needs.
Fireworks AI
VS
Together AI
Verdict by Category
AI content generation failed. Refresh the page to try again.
Detailed Comparison
Feature
Fireworks AI
Together AI
Pricing
PaidFireworks AI's serverless inference is pay-per-token with postpaid billing and $1 in free starter credits, with per-model rates across Standard, Priority, and Fast tiers detailed in its documentation (e.g. GLM 5.2 at $1.40/M input and $4.40/M output tokens, MiniMax M3 at $0.30/M input and $1.20/M output tokens). Embeddings are priced by base model size, from $0.008 to $0.10 per 1M input tokens. Training is priced per 1M training tokens for supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and direct preference optimization (DPO): LoRA SFT ranges from $0.50 (models up to 16B parameters) to $10.00 (models over 300B), with Full Param SFT and DPO costing roughly 2-4x more depending on model size and method. Reinforcement fine-tuning is billed per GPU hour at on-demand rates. The Serverless Training API charges separately for prefill, cached prefill, sample, and train tokens (e.g. Qwen 3.5 9B at $0.66-$1.995 per 1M tokens depending on operation). On-demand GPU deployments are billed per GPU hour: $7.00 for H100 or H200, $10.00 for B200, $12.00 for B300, and $18.00 for GB300, with region-restricted (US/Europe) deployments priced at 1.5x standard rates. Reserved and enterprise capacity pricing is available by contacting sales.
PaidTogether AI uses pay-as-you-go pricing across its products. Serverless inference is billed per model, priced per 1M tokens for text (e.g., MiniMax M3 at $0.30 input/$1.20 output, GLM-5.2 at $1.40 input/$4.40 output, gpt-oss-120B at $0.15 input/$0.60 output), per image for image generation (e.g., FLUX.1 [schnell] at $0.0027/image), per video for video models (e.g., ByteDance Seedance 2.5 at $0.115/video, Google Veo 3.0 at $1.60/video), and per audio minute or character for speech models. Dedicated Inference runs on single-tenant GPUs starting at $5.49/GPU/hour on-demand for NVIDIA HGX H100 and $8.99/hour for HGX B200, with reserved options available via sales. GPU Clusters offer on-demand rates from $3.99/hour (H100) to $8.19/hour (B200), with reserved pricing dropping as low as $3.19/hour for 181+ day H100 commitments. Sandbox compute costs $0.0446/vCPU/hour and $0.0149/GiB RAM/hour, with Code Interpreter sessions at $0.03 per 60-minute session. Fine-tuning is priced per 1M tokens processed, ranging from $0.48 (LoRA, up to 16B parameters) to $8.00 (full fine-tuning, 70-100B parameters) for standard models, with specialized model pricing (e.g., DeepSeek-R1, GLM-5) ranging $5-$40 per 1M tokens plus a minimum job charge. Managed Storage costs $0.16/GiB/month.
Categories
AI Developer APIs & Platforms
AI Developer APIs & Platforms
Summary
High-performance training and inference platform for open-source AI models
Full-stack AI cloud for inference, fine-tuning, and GPU clusters
Fireworks AI Pros & Cons
Pros
- Founded by former core PyTorch engineers with deep inference optimization expertise
- OpenAI and Anthropic-compatible API simplifies migration from closed-model providers
- Proprietary FireAttention and FireOptimizer deliver strong throughput and latency gains
- Full spectrum of training options from guided runs to fully custom RL loops
- Proven at massive scale, processing tens of trillions of tokens daily for 10,000+ customers
- Backed by major investors and used in production by Cursor, Notion, Vercel, and Quora
Cons
- Pricing is spread across serverless, on-demand, and training pages, requiring some effort to estimate total costs
- Region-restricted deployments in the US or Europe cost 1.5x standard on-demand rates
- Reserved and enterprise capacity requires contacting sales rather than transparent self-serve pricing
- Reinforcement fine-tuning billed per GPU hour can be harder to predict than flat per-token pricing
- Primarily focused on open-weight models, so access to fully closed frontier models is more limited
Together AI Pros & Cons
Pros
- OpenAI-compatible API makes migrating from closed-model providers straightforward
- Transparent per-model, pay-as-you-go pricing across 200+ open-source models
- Vertically integrated GPU cloud offers competitive on-demand and reserved rates
- Backed by deep systems research, including FlashAttention and other efficiency breakthroughs
- Full-stack coverage from inference to fine-tuning to raw GPU compute in one platform
- Proven at scale with customers like Cursor, Zoom, Quora, and ElevenLabs
Cons
- Pricing spans many separate model and product pages, making total cost estimation more complex than flat-rate competitors
- Dedicated GPU and reserved cluster pricing largely requires contacting sales rather than transparent self-serve rates
- Focus on open-source models means access to closed frontier models like GPT or Claude isn't the platform's core strength
- Fine-tuning costs vary significantly by model size and technique, requiring careful comparison before committing
- Provisioned throughput and PTU-based pricing has a learning curve for teams new to capacity-based billing