AI Tool Comparison
Comparing as AI Code Editors & IDEsAmazon Q Developer vs Cursor
Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and user ratings to decide which AI tool is best for your needs.
Amazon Q Developer
VS
Cursor
Verdict by Category
AI content generation failed. Refresh the page to try again.
Detailed Comparison
Feature
Amazon Q Developer
Cursor
Pricing
FreemiumAmazon Q Developer offers a Free Tier at $0/month, including code suggestions in the IDE and CLI, reference tracking for open-source code, 50 agentic requests per month, up to 1,000 lines of Java code transformation, and limited security scanning. The Pro Tier costs $19 per user per month and adds enterprise access management with policies, the ability to customize Q Developer to a company's private codebase for better suggestions, IP indemnification, and significantly higher usage limits across all features. As of May 29, 2026, Q Developer Pro no longer receives access to the newest coding models (including Opus 4.6 and later), which are now exclusive to Kiro, AWS's successor product. New Q Developer account and subscription signups were blocked starting May 15, 2026; only existing subscriptions can add new seats going forward.
FreemiumCursor's Hobby plan is free with no credit card required, offering limited Agent requests, limited Tab completions, and access to Composer. Pro costs $20/month and includes extended Agent limits, generous Grok and Composer limits, access to frontier models, MCPs/skills/hooks, cloud agents, and a $20 monthly credit pool for premium model usage. Pro+ costs $60/month with roughly 3x Pro's usage limits and a larger credit pool (~$70). Ultra costs $200/month with about 20x Pro's limits, a ~$400 credit pool, and priority access to new features. Teams Standard costs $40/user/month and adds centralized billing, a team marketplace, Bugbot code reviews, shared cloud agents, usage analytics, team-wide privacy mode, and SAML/OIDC SSO; Teams Premium costs around $120/user/month with roughly 5x Standard's included usage. Enterprise is custom-priced and adds pooled usage, invoice/PO billing, SCIM seat management, repository/model/MCP access controls, audit logs, and an AI code tracking API. Annual billing saves approximately 20% across all paid plans, and all prices are exclusive of applicable taxes.
Categories
AI Coding Assistants
AI Coding Assistants
Summary
AWS's generative AI coding assistant for the full software development lifecycle
AI-native code editor with autonomous agents for building software
Amazon Q Developer Pros & Cons
Pros
- Free tier includes genuinely useful code transformation and 50 agentic requests per month
- Deep, native AWS integration lets developers query live account resources directly from chat
- Automated Java and .NET version upgrades can save enterprise teams months of manual migration work
- Pro tier's flat $19/user/month price includes IP indemnification, competitive against similar enterprise tools
- AWS Console, Docs, and Slack/Teams integrations remain fully supported and unaffected by the IDE sunset
Cons
- AWS is sunsetting the product: new signups have been blocked since May 15, 2026, and the IDE plugins reach full end-of-support on April 30, 2027
- Latest coding models (including Opus 4.7 and newer) are exclusive to Kiro, AWS's replacement product, not available on Q Developer Pro
- Deepest value is tied to AWS-specific workflows; less compelling for teams not building on AWS
- No JetBrains-native experience going forward, since new investment is focused on Kiro
- Existing users face a forced migration to Kiro or a competitor within the next several months
Cursor Pros & Cons
Pros
- Deep AI-native integration rather than a bolted-on plugin experience
- Free Hobby tier available with no credit card required
- Wide model choice across OpenAI, Claude, Gemini, Grok, and in-house Composer models
- Autonomous cloud agents can work tasks end-to-end in parallel
- Privacy Mode guarantees code isn't used for model training when enabled
- SOC 2 certified with strong enterprise governance and access controls
Cons
- Credit-based billing means heavy agent or premium-model usage can exceed the base plan quickly
- Ultra tier is expensive at $200/month for power users
- As a VS Code fork, some proprietary VS Code extensions may not be fully compatible
- On-demand overage costs beyond included credits are billed in arrears and can surprise new users
- Enterprise pricing and invoice billing require contacting sales rather than transparent self-serve rates