AI Tool Comparison
Comparing as AI Pair Programming & Terminal AgentsClaude Code vs Devin
Claude Code
VS
Devin
Verdict by Category
Detailed Comparison
Feature
Claude Code
Devin
Pricing
PaidClaude Code is included in every paid Claude plan rather than sold separately. Pro is $17/month billed annually ($200 upfront) or $20/month billed monthly. Max starts at $100/month for 5x the usage of Pro, or $200/month for 20x the usage. Team offers Standard seats at $20/seat/month billed annually ($25/month billed monthly) and Premium seats (5x more usage) at $100/seat/month billed annually ($125/month billed monthly), with the ability to mix and match seat types. Enterprise is $20/seat/month plus usage billed at standard API rates, billed annually, and adds SCIM, audit logs, role-based access, custom data retention, and a HIPAA-ready offering. All plans share a single usage pool between Claude Code and Claude.ai chat activity, resetting on a rolling five-hour session window with weekly caps on paid plans; usage credits can be enabled on paid plans to continue working at standard API rates after hitting a limit. Claude Code is not available on the Free plan, but can also be accessed pay-as-you-go through a Claude Console (API) account.
FreemiumDevin's Free plan costs $0/month with a light quota to code with agents, limited model availability, and unlimited inline edits and Tab completions. Pro costs $20/month and adds increased quotas, access to OpenAI, Claude, and Gemini frontier models, free use of SWE 1.7 and leading open-source models, Devin Cloud access, and the ability to purchase extra usage at API pricing. Max costs $200/month with everything in Pro plus significantly higher usage quotas for power users. Teams costs $80/month as a base team fee plus $40/month per full developer seat, and includes unlimited team members via flex seats, sharing and collaboration, centralized billing, an admin dashboard with analytics, and priority support. Enterprise is custom-priced ("let's talk") and adds highest-priority support, dedicated account management, SAML/OIDC SSO, centralized enterprise admin controls, and dedicated VPC deployment options. Usage allowances refresh daily and weekly, and extra usage beyond included quotas is billed at API pricing.
Categories
AI Coding Assistants
AI Coding Assistants
Summary
Anthropic's agentic coding tool that lives in your terminal
Autonomous AI software engineer that plans, codes, and ships end-to-end
Claude Code Pros & Cons
Pros
- Deep codebase awareness that spans the full project rather than just the open file
- Fully scriptable and composable, fitting naturally into CI pipelines and existing terminal workflows
- MCP support connects it to external tools like Google Drive, Figma, Slack, and Jira
- Included in every paid Claude plan rather than requiring a separate subscription
- Available across terminal, IDE, desktop app, and browser for flexible workflows
Cons
- Not included in the Free plan; requires a paid Pro, Max, Team, or Enterprise subscription, or a pay-as-you-go API account
- Usage is pooled with regular Claude chat activity on subscription plans, so heavy terminal sessions can eat into the same limits used for everyday chatting
- Terminal-first design means it lacks the point-and-click familiarity of a full GUI IDE for developers who prefer that workflow
- Heavy agentic or automated workloads can run up token costs quickly if not managed with context management commands
- Enterprise-grade controls like SSO, SCIM, and audit logs require Team or Enterprise plans rather than being available on Pro
Devin Pros & Cons
Pros
- Handles full engineering workflows end-to-end, not just inline suggestions
- Fleet-based parallel agents can tackle large-scale migrations across many repos
- Deep integrations with GitHub, Linear, Jira, Slack, and Teams for real dev workflows
- Free tier available to try core agent capabilities with no cost
- Documented enterprise results, including major efficiency and cost gains at Nubank
- VPC deployment and SSO support enterprise security requirements
Cons
- Early benchmark and demo claims were criticized as overstated, so results should be evaluated against a team's own workflows
- Best suited to well-scoped, reviewable tasks rather than fully unsupervised production work
- Usage-based cost can climb quickly for teams running many parallel sessions
- Full model availability and cloud agents require the $20/month Pro plan or higher
- Quality of output still requires human review, especially on complex or ambiguous tasks