AI Tool Comparison
Comparing as AI Pair Programming & Terminal AgentsAmp vs Devin
Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and user ratings to decide which AI tool is best for your needs.
Verdict by Category
AI content generation failed. Refresh the page to try again.
Feature & Spec Matrix
Detailed Comparison22 Criteria
Complete side-by-side breakdown of specifications, capabilities, and feature parity
Swipe horizontally to compare features
Feature / Spec
Pricing Model
FreemiumAmp offers three pricing tiers. The free ad-supported tier includes Amp Tab autocomplete, core agent access with no hard token caps, thread sharing, and the Librarian codebase sub-agent. Sponsored suggestions appear in non-code contexts (dashboard, docs lookups). No credit card required.
Smart Mode at $20/month removes ads, opts out of data sharing and model training, unlocks Oracle Mode at full reasoning depth, and provides priority model routing during peak demand. As of August 2026, Smart Mode also allows routing usage through a linked ChatGPT or X Premium+ subscription at no extra per-token cost.
A $200/month tier covers higher-volume individual usage. For teams, Amp offers workspace management with centralized billing, admin controls, shared threads and workflows, and enterprise-grade security. Enterprise pricing is custom and adds SOC 2 compliance, zero data retention, and dedicated support.
FreemiumDevin's Free plan costs $0/month with a light quota to code with agents, limited model availability, and unlimited inline edits and Tab completions. Pro costs $20/month and adds increased quotas, access to OpenAI, Claude, and Gemini frontier models, free use of SWE 1.7 and leading open-source models, Devin Cloud access, and the ability to purchase extra usage at API pricing. Max costs $200/month with everything in Pro plus significantly higher usage quotas for power users. Teams costs $80/month as a base team fee plus $40/month per full developer seat, and includes unlimited team members via flex seats, sharing and collaboration, centralized billing, an admin dashboard with analytics, and priority support. Enterprise is custom-priced ("let's talk") and adds highest-priority support, dedicated account management, SAML/OIDC SSO, centralized enterprise admin controls, and dedicated VPC deployment options. Usage allowances refresh daily and weekly, and extra usage beyond included quotas is billed at API pricing.
Starting Price
Difference
Free (ad-supported) — Smart Mode $20/mo — $200/mo (high-volume)
$500/mo (Pro/Enterprise Seats) or Usage Compute
Free Plan & Trial Scope
Difference
Free ad-supported tier with Amp Tab autocomplete, core agent access with no hard token caps, thread sharing, and the Librarian codebase sub-agent. No credit card required.
Trial evaluation and sandbox access for verified software development teams
User Rating Score
Unrated
Unrated
Ideal Workflow / Use Case
Difference
Individual developers and teams who want a capable free AI coding agent with multi-model routing, deep codebase search via the Librarian, and multi-editor support without IDE lock-in
Autonomous legacy codebase migration, end-to-end bug fixing from GitHub issues, automated dependency updates, and boilerplate microservice creation
Enterprise & Scalability
Difference
Enterprise-grade security and compliance, team workspace management, admin controls over feature availability, shared threads and workflows, SOC 2 certification, zero data retention for enterprise, centralized billing
Full sandboxed developer environment (browser, shell, code editor), autonomous GitHub issue resolution, automated test writing and execution, complex multi-file architectural refactoring, custom documentation reading, and SOC 2 Type II compliance
Core Categories
Difference
AI Coding AssistantsAI Productivity ToolsAI Developer APIs & PlatformsAI No-Code / Automation ToolsAI Search Engines
AI Coding AssistantsAI Developer APIs & Platforms
Multi-model routing — automatically selects between Claude Opus 4.7, Sonnet 4.6, GPT-5, and other frontier models based on task complexity and mode (low/medium/high/ultra)
Supported
Supported
Librarian sub-agent — searches all public GitHub plus connected private repos natively without leaving the session, powered by Sourcegraph's code intelligence infrastructure
Supported
Supported
200K token context window for holding large codebases in working memory during complex multi-file refactors and feature implementations
Difference
Amp Advantage
Not listed
Ad-supported free tier — unlimited Amp Tab autocomplete, core agent access with no hard token caps, and thread sharing at zero cost
Difference
Amp Advantage
Not listed
Available across CLI, VS Code extension, Cursor, Windsurf, JetBrains IDEs, Zed, and Neovim — no new UI to learn
Supported
Supported
Smart Mode (paid) — zero data sharing/training, priority model routing during peak demand, and Oracle Mode at full reasoning depth
Difference
Amp Advantage
Not listed
Persistent threads and project memory — long-term task tracking with shared threads and context across sessions and team members
Difference
Amp Advantage
Not listed
Sub-agent parallel task execution — orchestrator delegates subtasks to parallel sub-agents and integrates results for complex multi-step workflows
Difference
Amp Advantage
Not listed
Devin Desktop and Devin CLI for local and terminal-based agent work
Difference
Not listed
Devin Advantage
Devin Review for automated PR review and visual QA
Difference
Not listed
Devin Advantage
DeepWiki for auto-generating documentation and system diagrams
Difference
Not listed
Devin Advantage
Learns and retains codebase-specific tribal knowledge over time
Difference
Not listed
Devin Advantage
Integrates with GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Linear, Jira, Slack, and Teams
Difference
Not listed
Devin Advantage
Devin API and Automations for scheduling recurring agent tasks
Difference
Not listed
Devin Advantage
VPC deployment and SAML/OIDC SSO for enterprise security
Difference
Not listed
Devin Advantage
Amp Pros & Cons
Pros
- Ad-supported free tier is the only genuinely unlimited free tier among major coding agents — no hard token caps, no daily limits
- Multi-model routing across Claude, GPT, and other frontier models per task — not locked to a single AI provider
- The Librarian uniquely enables live search across all public GitHub and private repos without loading files manually
- Sourcegraph's code intelligence infrastructure gives Amp deeper codebase context than most terminal agents
- Available in CLI plus every major editor (VS Code, Cursor, Windsurf, JetBrains, Zed, Neovim) — true editor-agnostic flexibility
- 40,000+ teams adopted within the first months of 2026 — rapid validation of product-market fit after spin-out
Cons
- Ad-supported free tier means sponsored suggestions appear in non-code contexts like the dashboard and docs lookups
- No open-source code — closed-source commercial product unlike Cline, Goose, or OpenHands
- Smart Mode (no data sharing) requires a paid subscription — free tier users' interactions inform Amp's training pipeline
- As of August 2026 Amp subscriptions are $20 and $200/month — pricing is now similar to Claude Code and Cursor, eliminating its former pay-as-you-go-only advantage
- CLI-first design means limited visual IDE experience compared to Cursor or Windsurf — no GUI file explorer or diff viewer built in
- Spun out from Sourcegraph in December 2025 — organizational independence is new and long-term stability is still being established
Devin Pros & Cons
Pros
- Handles full engineering workflows end-to-end, not just inline suggestions
- Fleet-based parallel agents can tackle large-scale migrations across many repos
- Deep integrations with GitHub, Linear, Jira, Slack, and Teams for real dev workflows
- Free tier available to try core agent capabilities with no cost
- Documented enterprise results, including major efficiency and cost gains at Nubank
- VPC deployment and SSO support enterprise security requirements
Cons
- Early benchmark and demo claims were criticized as overstated, so results should be evaluated against a team's own workflows
- Best suited to well-scoped, reviewable tasks rather than fully unsupervised production work
- Usage-based cost can climb quickly for teams running many parallel sessions
- Full model availability and cloud agents require the $20/month Pro plan or higher
- Quality of output still requires human review, especially on complex or ambiguous tasks
Head-to-Head Battle Cards
Popular Comparisons
Direct feature matrices, pricing breakdowns, and real-world benchmark duels

AI Coding AssistantsCompare

AI Coding AssistantsCompare

AI Coding AssistantsCompare

AI Coding AssistantsCompare

