AI Tool Comparison

Comparing as AI Medical Research & Clinical Decision Support
Tempus AI vs Freed AI

Tempus AI

Tempus AI

VS
Freed AI

Freed AI

Verdict by Category

Detailed category analysis is not available for this comparison.

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Tempus AI
Freed AI
Pricing
CustomTempus operates multiple revenue streams with different access models. Clinical genomic tests (xT, xG, xR, xF, xE) are ordered by physicians through the standard laboratory test ordering process. Pricing varies by test type and is typically covered by insurance for oncology patients. Tempus works directly with health systems to integrate ordering into EHR workflows. Enterprise data platform access, Algos population health analytics, and biopharma research partnerships are priced through custom enterprise licensing agreements. Biopharma companies license Tempus's de-identified patient datasets and analytical services for drug development and clinical trial design. Tempus is publicly traded on NASDAQ (ticker: TEM) since June 2024. Investor and enterprise partnership inquiries can be directed through tempus.com.
PaidFreed publishes clear, tiered pricing, unlike some enterprise-focused competitors that require a sales call. The AI Scribe has four tiers: Starter at $39/month (billed annually) or $59/month (billed monthly) for 1 clinician and up to 40 notes/month; Core at roughly $59-79/month for unlimited notes and Clinical Evidence; Premier at $104/month (annual) or $119/month (monthly) for the full suite including EHR push, dictation, and ICD-10/CPT coding; and custom Groups pricing for multi-clinician clinics with admin dashboards, SSO, and volume discounts. Freed Front Desk, the separate AI receptionist product, starts at $149/month per block of 250 calls. All AI Scribe plans include a 7-day free trial with no credit card required, and residents, students, and trainees can get the Core plan free through Freed's pilot program.
Categories
AI Healthcare ToolsAI Research & Education Tools
AI Healthcare ToolsAI Productivity ToolsAI Chatbots
Summary
AI precision medicine platform — genomic profiling, clinical insights, and trial matching for personalized cancer care
Affordable AI medical scribe and front desk for independent clinics, starting at $39/month
Tempus AI

Tempus AI Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Publicly traded (NASDAQ: TEM) — one of the most credible precision medicine AI companies
  • 7M+ de-identified patient records — one of the world's largest clinical-molecular datasets
  • Comprehensive genomic testing across 6 test types covering all major oncology applications
  • Tempus One AI provides real-time clinical insights at the point of care
  • TIME Trial dramatically improves clinical trial matching and enrollment rates
  • 3,800+ employees and $8.79B total capital raised since founding
  • Expanding beyond oncology into neuropsychiatry, cardiology, and infectious disease

Cons

  • Enterprise and institutional pricing — not accessible to individual clinicians or small practices
  • Focused primarily on oncology and genomics — not a general-purpose clinical AI tool
  • Genomic test turnaround requires laboratory processing time
  • Data platform access and licensing requires formal agreements
  • Some AI insights require institutional genomic data infrastructure to fully leverage
Freed AI

Freed AI Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Transparent, published pricing starting at $39/month, unusually clear for the AI medical scribe category
  • Purpose-built for independent and small-to-midsized clinics rather than enterprise health systems
  • Combines scribing, cited clinical Q&A, and coding suggestions in one affordable tool
  • High reported accuracy (98% recall on medical terms) and accessible US-based human support
  • New Front Desk product extends the same AI to patient calls and messaging, not just documentation
  • 7-day free trial with no credit card required, plus free access for residents and students

Cons

  • No native EHR API write-back for most systems; EHR push works only with browser-based EHRs, not deep two-way integrations like Epic or Oracle Health
  • Front Desk is still in beta with a waitlisted 'Advanced' tier, so scheduling and insurance verification aren't yet automated
  • Higher tiers (Premier, Groups) are needed to unlock EHR push, coding, and multi-user features, which adds up for growing clinics
  • Built for browser-based, ambulatory workflows, so it's a weaker fit for large hospital systems already standardized on Epic or Cerner
  • Audio is only temporarily retained during processing, so there's no persistent recording to fall back on after a note is finalized