AICentralResources
AI Tool Comparison

Comparing as AI Code Editors & IDEs
Augment Code vs Amazon Q Developer

Augment Code

Augment Code

VS
Amazon Q Developer

Amazon Q Developer

Verdict by Category

Detailed category analysis is not available for this comparison.
View Augment Code View Amazon Q Developer

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Augment Code
Amazon Q Developer
Pricing
PaidAugment Code uses a usage-based pricing model with two tiers. The Business plan costs $100/month flat for up to 50 seats. This includes $100 of pooled monthly usage across LLM inference (billed at provider list price + 40% service fee), Context Engine API calls, and Cosmos compute. Usage is shared across the whole team. Top-ups are available pay-as-you-go at any time; top-ups expire 12 months after purchase. The Enterprise plan has custom pricing for teams over 50 seats. It adds custom usage limits and top-up rates, volume-based annual discounts, SSO/OIDC/SCIM, Customer Managed Encryption Keys (CMEK), ISO/IEC 42001 compliance, SIEM integration, data residency options, granular audit trails, multi-region compute, unlimited concurrent sessions, and a dedicated customer success manager with priority support. All paid plans include a guarantee of no AI training on customer data. A 7-day free trial is available. Previously Augment charged $60/active user/month under a named-seat model before switching to flat/usage-based pricing in October 2025.
FreemiumAmazon Q Developer offered two tiers during its active lifetime. The Free Tier provided 50 inline code suggestions/day, 25 agentic requests/month, 5 security scans/month, basic inline chat, and CLI completions — free for all AWS Builder ID holders. The Pro Tier cost $19/user/month and included unlimited code suggestions, 500 agentic requests/month, 30 security scans/month, enterprise access controls via IAM Identity Center, customization on private repositories, 4,000 pooled lines of code transformation (Java upgrades and .NET porting) per payer account, and no use of customer content for model training. As of May 15, 2026, new Q Developer Free Tier account creation and new subscription creation are blocked. Existing subscriptions remain active and can add users until April 30, 2027 (end-of-support date). AWS is directing all new users to Kiro (kiro.dev), which includes a subscription that also grants access to Q Developer IDE plugins during the transition window.
Categories
AI Coding AssistantsAI Productivity ToolsAI Developer APIs & Platforms
AI Coding Assistants
Summary
AI coding agent with deep Context Engine for large enterprise codebases
AWS's AI coding assistant — deprecated in favor of Kiro (EOS April 2027)
Augment Code

Augment Code Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Deepest codebase context of any AI coding tool — Context Engine indexes 400K+ files with semantic graphs, not just open tabs
  • #1 on SWE-bench Pro at 51.80% (Auggie CLI) — top publicly benchmarked coding agent score at publication
  • First and only AI coding assistant with ISO/IEC 42001 certification alongside SOC 2 Type II and CMEK
  • Usage-based flat pricing ($100/mo for up to 50 seats) is more predictable than per-seat models for variable teams
  • Cosmos platform covers the full SDLC — from ticket to PR, code review, tests, incidents, migrations, and onboarding
  • Trusted by Adobe, MongoDB, Webflow, Snyk, Pure Storage, Crypto.com, Tekion, and DXC across enterprise codebases

Cons

  • No free individual tier — Business plan starts at $100/month with a team minimum; sole developers pay full price for low usage
  • Pricing changed three times in 18 months (2023–2025), causing some developer community backlash and unpredictability concerns
  • IDE support limited to VS Code and JetBrains — no standalone IDE, no Neovim full feature parity, no Visual Studio
  • Closed-source with no self-hosting option — all computation runs on Augment's infrastructure or Enterprise cloud tenants
  • Context Engine first-run indexing takes 15–30 minutes on large repos before initial suggestions become fully accurate
  • Enterprise plan requires sales contact for pricing — no public list price above the Business tier
Amazon Q Developer

Amazon Q Developer Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Deepest AWS ecosystem integration of any coding assistant — native support for AWS Console, SageMaker, CloudFormation, CodePipeline, and more
  • Free Tier was genuinely usable for AWS-focused solo developers with no credit card required
  • Built-in security scanning and code transformation (Java runtime upgrades, .NET porting) for enterprise modernization
  • Trusted by enterprise customers for AWS-specific guidance with the highest reported code acceptance rates in the industry (BT Group: 37%, National Australia Bank: 50%)
  • CLI integration with natural language–to-bash translation for DevOps and infrastructure workflows
  • Console integration extends AI assistance beyond the IDE into the AWS Management Console, Slack, and Teams

Cons

  • New signups blocked since May 15, 2026 — IDE plugin and paid subscriptions reach full end-of-support on April 30, 2027
  • Being replaced by Kiro — latest models (Claude Opus 4.7+) are only available on Kiro, not Q Developer
  • Code transformation (Java, .NET) will be inaccessible after April 30, 2027 — users must complete migrations before then
  • AWS Console and first-party integrations (Slack, Teams) continue, but IDE-specific features are sunsetting
  • Less flexible than Cursor or Windsurf for non-AWS workloads — best value only for AWS-heavy teams